jump to contentmy subreddits
limit my search to /r/Fitnessuse the following search parameters to narrow your results:see the search faq for details.
I read an article in a jogging magazine that said the lightest and thinnest running shoes are usually the best. Also it said the cheapest running shoes are usually better for actually running than the name brand shoes with all the bells and whistles. The article said jogging shoes you buy from a store tend to put more emphasis on using the heel of the foot to push off and stabilize, whereas our feet are actually better able to run by putting more emphasis on the ball of the foot toward the front. But I a student and can really afford new shoes to replace them ):Not yet. Currently if I planning for longer than 7 miles, I tape each toe individually, which takes a long time and feels weird and sticky, but is cheaper than having $20 Injinji socks shipped to me in Switzerland. As soon as I get back in the US for the start of the school year, I have a pair waiting for me at my apartment to try thanks for the suggestion (:
Personally, I wouldn buy Nike Frees again, because I don think I should have to buy special socks to compensate for a weird shoe geometry. I never had that problem with any other running shoes I owned, why the Frees?
close this windowyou’ll need to or register to do thatcreate a new accountall it takes is a username and password.
Recent Comments