jump to contentmy subreddits
limit my search to /r/malefashionadviceuse the following search parameters to narrow your results:see air jordan 19 white varsity red the search faq for details. Whether you care about the aesthetics of your sports equipment or you believe that function is all that matters, air jordan spizike white red blue I have no problem with either position. Except it totally irrelevant here. This particular post isn about running shoes worn on the road, trail or track . It is, however, about shoes that could be (and models directly inspired by them, like Roshes and Air Maxes).
I think classifying broad clothing styles into rigid categories is reductionist and silly, but air jordan x 10 chicago retro 2012 put a gun to my head and I say running shoes fit best air jordan 2011 white black blue into streetwear and techwear, especially monochromatic stuff. Personally, I think they look ridiculous when they shoved into outfits like this. Maybe you feel differently.
Here a discussion thread from a few months ago about what separates running shoes that work in these fits and those that don The top rated comment is really solid.
Why so many rolled up pants?! From my perspective, that completely consistent with the aesthetic these guys are going for. The shoes are clearly intended to draw the eye and be a focus air jordan 9 14 countdown package of the outfit rolling or cuffing just reinforces that.
Nike owns this category. They filling this niche air jordan force 5 white orange blue that I believe air jordan 8 viii retro ls lifestyle is based on the perception that good running shoes = air jordan 11 gamma blue 2013 good walking shoes, which can be true but isn always the case. So to counteract the runner shoes should never be worn outside of exercise they taken to making their shoes more stylish. (This seems like a sound idea, because the hardcore running market is competitive.)
Whereas ASICS (not tigers), Brooks, etc. couldn care less. air jordan 10 retro bobcats 2014 They decided to only go after runners for now.
That being said. I think it interesting that when Nike moved to sponsor a UFC fighter, they didn go with the biggest name, Anderson Silva, they went with Jon Jones, because like it or not a young athletic black dude from New York is a air jordan 1 retro high black max orange white lot cooler than a middle aged guy that doesn have as much of a personality. In hindsight this seems like a genius marketing move because Silva got KO while Jones is still going strong, but obviously Nike didn know that would happen so it kind of irrelevantIf better is subjective than what the point of any of this? Throw on whatever you want and call it subjective.
To harken back to the original post, if Ryan Gosling was wearing Nike those would look worse to me. They may or may not have looked bad, but it would been worse than what he did choose, because what he was wearing looked extremely well put together.
Leave A Response